Wow, thankyou. I went to print the thought provoking list then saw how many pages. You have put a lot of time, thought and commitment into this work. Thankyou.
No. Are you Benji Bussys love child ? I mean come on I can dish it out better than you guys. If insult is all you have, which is what is apparent, you have no rational argument at all.
It seems irrational to take anything Seymour says at face value. He's clearly been trained and worked for and is implementing a corporate agenda. If you want rational arguments to that affect, feel free to look over some of my other articles. I'm not generally as snarky as my bot comment, so apologies if you're actually looking to discuss.
Thanks. I just hate invective. My argument is that officials already certify Treaty compliance and BORA alignment. I cant see why they ought not address the less woke but more meaningful issue- will the proposed regulation achieve its purpose or should other ways be pursued ? Just an explanation.
Complete gibberish. If Labor-Te Pati- Green want an irrational costly idea- like bring back prohibition- their government can do so. It just has to disclose that they have rejected a more rational approach (increase taxes, education). Otherwise no need for Tiriti certification or BORA compliance statements.
Wow, thankyou. I went to print the thought provoking list then saw how many pages. You have put a lot of time, thought and commitment into this work. Thankyou.
It's an absolute corporate power grab disguised as freedom.
Hope the pushback succeeds before this ideological weapon locks in.
No. Are you Benji Bussys love child ? I mean come on I can dish it out better than you guys. If insult is all you have, which is what is apparent, you have no rational argument at all.
It seems irrational to take anything Seymour says at face value. He's clearly been trained and worked for and is implementing a corporate agenda. If you want rational arguments to that affect, feel free to look over some of my other articles. I'm not generally as snarky as my bot comment, so apologies if you're actually looking to discuss.
Thanks. I just hate invective. My argument is that officials already certify Treaty compliance and BORA alignment. I cant see why they ought not address the less woke but more meaningful issue- will the proposed regulation achieve its purpose or should other ways be pursued ? Just an explanation.
Complete gibberish. If Labor-Te Pati- Green want an irrational costly idea- like bring back prohibition- their government can do so. It just has to disclose that they have rejected a more rational approach (increase taxes, education). Otherwise no need for Tiriti certification or BORA compliance statements.
Are you a Seymour bot? Never take what Seymour or the NZ Initiative say at face value. Their corporate ties are clearly traceable.