32 Comments
User's avatar
Rebecca Sinclair's avatar

So many yeses. And the part I can't go past is that the rich holing themselves up in bunkers and gated communities will also have nothing left. Because we are interdependent (they/we have just forgotten their/our dependence). It is literally a race to the bottom. That is the problem—forgetting/ignoring/being oblivious to your dependencies, results in your own extinction in the end too. Despite all 'our' (we exclusive—mātou) efforts to escape our reliance on others, we too are ecological. Always and forever. (I want to add a FFS here...). It doesn't matter what you label it—it is eco-logic that actually sits underneath everything. Super appreciate your work Ryan.

Expand full comment
Ryan Ward's avatar

Always grateful for your expansive and wholistic perspective.

Expand full comment
Cass Booth's avatar

This is bang on. But how? The poisons of ‘socialist’ becoming an insult and the relentless avarice of the 1% makes it nigh on impossible to get this message out to those who need to understand it. It’s not sexy, it’s scary. It’s not as compelling as a new phone or plumped up lips or scratching over the bones of What’s Wrong With Megan. Populations have been dumbed down to the extent that the dopamine hit is king. Lust after things that are impossible to afford, never question what is enough. We live in interesting times. When will our bubble burst? And what will be left when it does ?

Depressing but thank you for the excellent analysis.

Expand full comment
CambridgeDoffoG's avatar

You echo my thoughts exactly.

Expand full comment
Djderiva's avatar

I didn’t vote

Expand full comment
Janine's avatar

Excellent article Ryan, great writing so on the mark. Bloody scary that we are watching capitalism at it’s most evil and dystopian in the US and know everyday in Aotearoa that Luxon, Seymour and Willis are ‘working hard’ to push us down the same corridor taking from and punching down on the poor, working class, young, women, māori, vulnerable and syphoning off to the wealthy. The budget another assault and the RSB will be the cherry on top for them. Wake the fuck up Aotearoa. Keep up your great mahi Ryan.

Expand full comment
Ryan Ward's avatar

Cheers!!!

Expand full comment
Keith Simes's avatar

Consumer-spectator is a delightful descriptor, but I would add ‘victim’, most abusive relationships rely on the victim not being able to see the whole picture

Expand full comment
Ryan Ward's avatar

Good point. And even when they realize the relationship is abusive it’s extremely difficult to extract themselves from.

Expand full comment
Margaret Grace's avatar

Great article! The problem is changing the perception of 'socialism'. The few socialist politicians there are don't seem to be able to articulate what it is or how it could work. People have been brainwashed into believing we would all be wearing grey jumpsuits and tilling the fields.

Expand full comment
Ryan Ward's avatar

Excellent point! I’m hoping if enough of us aren’t scared to use the term we can reclaim it from its misrepresentation.

Expand full comment
Keith Simes's avatar

And if they are looking like they may be successful the weight of the machine comes down hard - think Bernie Sanders or Jeremy Corbyn

Expand full comment
Peter Littler's avatar

It's been obvious to me for time that if Labour and Co try and fight the next election in the center they will lose. And by all accounts that is what they are planning. The obvious reason of course is the right has the media to control the narrative. Which is exactly what happened when Jacinda tried to introduce Three Waters. Removing the possibility of private ownership was never going to fly.

Expand full comment
Alan's avatar

Yes, exactly.

Perhaps a way to achieve change is to work within the system from the bottom up. Co-operative ventures, for example;

Have a look at Mondragon in Spain https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation

Expand full comment
Harriet's avatar

Agree, there are some great minds on the ‘non capitalist side’ (and I don’t mean in politics) that could surely conceive a plan that beats them at their own game?? Eg

Expand full comment
Alan's avatar

I meant to add, the alternative is Gaza.

Expand full comment
Michael Worth's avatar

Some of your finest work

Expand full comment
Ryan Ward's avatar

Thank you! I was experimenting with a bit less academic and more stream of consciousness type of post. Glad you found it useful.

Expand full comment
Paul Bennett's avatar

Love your work Ryan

Expand full comment
Ryan Ward's avatar

Thank you!! That means a lot.

Expand full comment
Mike Henden's avatar

The billionaire class warn us that ‘socialism’ = ‘communism’, and if we chose that route every asset will be collectively owned and there will be just one class of ‘mediocrity’. And, of course, the proletariat. But this isn’t socialism. Socialism, to my mind, is simply the building of caring communities and working together for the good of all sectors of society.

Expand full comment
Roscoe Changleen's avatar

I've read this a few times now. It's absolutely excellent. The system we designed, that we write the rules for, the rules for how we run our world have got away from us, no longer serving humanity but capital, past the point of genocide and into the destruction of the biome of planet Earth itself. It's becoming existentially desperate that we change course. When we do this, it's essential that we centre life – life itself, the quality of everyone's lives, the progression of our species and the life of our planet as our key performance indicators. The ideas of neoliberalism are literally the same as a cancer, and they are having the same effect on our world. We must cut it out.

Expand full comment
Ryan Ward's avatar

I'm so glad you found it useful. It is indeed existentially desperate, getting moreso every day.

Expand full comment
Arohanui-Grace's avatar

Thank you for your thoughtful commentary, as always. I have wandered down similar pathways as I've tried to make sense of the insane times in which we live, whilst still keeping my head above water.

I wonder if a side step isn't required. Maybe we're not looking to 'reclaim' socialism - and instead the word you are looking for offers a uniquely kiwi solution, still in the making? Kotahitanga was offered by Kingi Tuheitia for ALL, not just Maori. Kotahitanga embodies the relationship and collective endeavour of the socialism you speak of, and/plus. It helps us to weave together (all of us) the complexity of te taura tangata - the rope of man, and we're in the process of learning by doing, right now.

Expand full comment
Simp Of Human Progress's avatar

Reformists will cling to half measures, but you’re right: there’s no negotiating with a system built on extraction and death.

Socialism isn’t utopian; it’s survival. The only question left is how much more suffering it’ll take before the working class realizes its power.

Keep sharpening the analysis. We need this fire.

Expand full comment
Craig Snelgrove, PhD's avatar

Great work, man. I agree with you completely.

Expand full comment
Christina Billing's avatar

Read this after just putting down the book "They call it love", Alba Gotby - centred on the need to radically restrucutre society. Both regrettably cathartic and necessary reads. Thanks Ryan.

Expand full comment
Ron Stuart's avatar

A thought provoking read

Expand full comment
Ryan Ward's avatar

Thank you.

Expand full comment